This should make it easier for you to review the device’s specifications and determine whether you require it. The procedure aids in reducing the number of possibilities and obtaining the ideal router for your needs. Aside from this, it’s important to mention that the TP-Link Archer C2300 is among the best routers the company has ever produced. People have recently questioned whether or not this item is worthwhile, therefore you will check our article on TP-Link Archer C2300 review. If you want a lot of customization and don’t have a lot of devices on your network, the Archer C2300 is a good option overall. The only problem I experienced with the AC2300 gadget was how patchy its 2.4GHz coverage was. If you stream or play games on multiple devices simultaneously in a medium- or large-sized home, there’s a chance you might encounter dead spots or slowdowns in specific locations.
TP-Link Archer C2300 review: Design
Don’t let the TP-Link Archer C2300’s exterior deceive you. Although the router appears to be a typical, mild-mannered home router, it actually possesses the heart of an online tiger. The Linksys WRT 32X and Netgear Nighthawk XR500, two home networking products, compete with the C2300 in terms of performance. It is the closest thing to a home networking equivalent of the stealth fighter with its incredible capabilities while remaining undetectable in the background. Undoubtedly, this router is hot in more ways than one. The rectangular, black design has a big heat sink underneath the top and a vented top to help spread the heat produced. Its housing had a surface temperature of more over 100 degrees Fahrenheit, making it unbearably hot to the touch. The C2300 is roughly one-third the size of the Nighthawk XR500 and measures 8.5 x 7.5 x 1.5 inches. It resembles a cigar box in size. The TP-Link router has holes on the bottom for wall mounting and is small enough to fit on a shelf. The Broadcom BCM4365E Wi-Fi chip in the C2300 enables it to create a dual-band network that can carry three different streams of data traffic. According to the manufacturer’s specifications, this device’s memory and flash storage are both 512 MB, and its top speeds are 600 Mbps in 2.4GHz mode and 1.6225 Gbps in 5GHz mode. Theoretically, there is a 2.225 terabit per second bandwidth. The WRT 32X’s Killer Prioritization engine and the Nighthawk XR500’s geo-filtering feature are absent from the C2300, although it does use TP-Quality Link’s of Service (QOS) software to distribute available bandwidth. The C2300 also includes NitroQAM modulation, a technology from Broadcom that can boost data transmission speeds by up to 25% by compressing more data into the available frequencies. In other words, aside from its outward look, it is a high-performance router in every respect. The C2300 has four subdued light blue indicators on the front instead of many flashing lights. They show whether the system is operational, whether it is connected to the internet, and whether the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands are being used. You can turn off each of these lights using the single switch at the top.
Setup
You have the option of using the Tether Android or iOS app or a browser-based interface to configure the system. The C2300 can therefore be set up to work with PCs, Macs, iPhones, iPads, and Android devices. It can function as an access point or a router. Set-by-step instructions with helpful graphics are available in the Tether app. We clicked to configure the C2300 as a router after accepting the company’s license, then we plugged the device in and followed its instructions to let it start up. The C2300 router was located by the app a short while later. It’s a good idea to change the device’s default randomized network names and pass codes to something more individualized and secure. These are printed on a card that comes with the device. It took around 5 minutes to start the C2300 using the Tether app. Via a similar vein, the Quick Setup Wizard in the browser method guided us through the setup procedure. It began with entering “tplinkwifi.net” into the address bar of a system that was connected. The router’s IP address, 192.168.1.0.1, can also be accessed directly. The wizard poses questions along the route, such as what kind of broadband connection you have. Fortunately, it guesses the response and for our cable modem, it was accurate. The software displayed a summary of the settings after finishing. From beginning to end, it took about 10 minutes. you will read our article on TP-Link Archer C2300 review.
TP-Link Archer C2300 review: Features
Given that the Archer C2300 and TP-Link Archer C3150 V2 are very comparable in terms of features (despite the fact that the Archer C2300 is a dual-band, three-stream router), they are similarly outfitted in terms of features. The Multi-User Multiple Input Multiple Output (MU-MIMO) technology, which should enable simultaneous communication with up to three devices, is first supported by the C2300. Serving one client at a time and letting them compete for bandwidth were the traditional methods, but MU-MIMO can significantly enhance network behavior and efficiency. The majority of you won’t be able to use MU-MIMO at all because your connected wireless devices must have a compatible MU-MIMO adapter, which are hard to come by and are very expensive. This is despite the fact that MU-MIMO is one of the best technologies to have implemented in the consumer router. The Smart Connect technology, another feature of the C2300, automatically assigns connected devices to the best radio band. The Smart Connect feature is typically connected to tri-band routers (like the Archer C3200, the D-Link AC3200 Ultra WiFi DIR-890L/R, or the ASUS RT-AC3200), where managing three different networks would be difficult and the need for an effortless connection to the three bands takes precedence. Of course, a dual-band router can also benefit greatly from this type of dynamic algorithm, as its Smart Connect feature analyses signal strength, distances between clients and routers, looks for crowded channels, and determines which band is best for your devices (be aware that, in order to take advantage of either the TurboQAM or NitroQAM, you need to have compatible built-in wireless cards). Additionally, the router supports beamforming, which directs the signal at the connected clients rather than broadcasting it broadly in the hopes that it would eventually reach your devices (once again, you need devices with compatible wireless cards to take advantage of this feature – thankfully, this is more widespread than the MU-MIMO).
Performance
The C2300’s outstanding range and speed are made possible by the latest Mu-MIMO and beam-forming techniques, which are concealed behind the device’s svelte black casing and are powered by a Broadcom BCM4365E Wi-Fi processor. At our Utah site, which was utilising Ixia’s ixChariot software at the time, the router quickly made a name for itself as the router to beat. It is the fastest router available, reaching a peak speed of 963.6 Mbps, and is almost ready to deliver 1 Gbps of data at full capacity. The Norton Core (672.2 Mbps at 5 feet) was 28% faster than the WRT 32X (544.5 Mbps at 15 feet), which was 42 percent faster. Additionally, the Nighthawk XR500 (24 percent quicker) was 42 percent quicker. The throughput rises with distance from the router, going from 682.3 Mbps at 15 feet to 913.8 Mbps at 50 feet, which makes this a fantastic midrange router. At 100 and 150 feet, the C2300 produced 613.2 and 342.5 megabits per second, respectively. Only the Norton Core delivered 384.1 Mbps at a 150-foot distance with better performance. With a download speed of 921.7 Mbps available on the other side of our soundboard wall, the C2300 set the bar in our tests of how well the router transmits its signal through walls and ceilings. That’s roughly 200 megabits per second more data than Norton Core could process at 700 megabits per second. The TP-Link router recorded rates of 620.8 and 629.8 Mbps on the opposite side of our metal wall and ceiling, respectively. Although Core fared slightly better, achieving 662.6 and 705.8 Mbps for the metal wall and ceiling tests, respectively, those are acceptable speeds. Despite this, distributing a data signal in homes with several walls and high ceilings should be a success with the C2300. This transmission power was more than sufficient to completely power our 3,500 square foot, older home. The C2300’s range with our iPad Pro is 110 feet, which is only marginally less than the Nighthawk XR500’s range of 115 feet but is still quite impressive. The mesh network from TP-Deco Link can be connected to the C2300, making it ideal for larger homes.
TP-Link Archer C2300 review: Hardware
The best Wi-Fi router is the TP-Link Archer, which has a dual-core Broadcom BCM4906 1.8 GHz CPU, 512 MB of RAM, a BCM4906 Ethernet chipset, and 128 MB of flash memory (ESMT F59L1G81MA-25T). The BCM4360 3 x 3:3 Broadcom chip also provides wireless performance on the 2.4 GHz radio band. The use of NitroQAM technology enhances chip performance even more. The chipset uses 1024 QAM modulation, which improves performance by 25% over the earlier 256-QAM modulation. You will therefore experience higher throughput when using 802.11ac. The TurboQAM technology, which is more widely used, is also used by the C2300 router to maximize the 200 Mbps per data stream transfer rate on the 2.4 GHz radio frequency band. As a result, the theoretical maximum speed at 2.4 GHz is 600 Mbps and at 5 GHz is 1,625 Mbps.
Price
There are WPS and Reset buttons, a Wi-Fi On/Off button, a USB 2.0 port, and a USB 3.0 port on the left side of the router. The dual-band TP-Link Archer C2300 router has a simple interface, a tone of features, and added security. The best part is that it is only $150. You will receive good 5GHz speed for that price, as well as useful extras like TP-Link Homecare’s parental controls, network prioritization, and antivirus. you will learn our article on TP-Link Archer C2300 review.
Conclusion
One of the company’s top products, the AC2300 is the “younger brother” of the AC3150 and has noticeably simpler hardware while maintaining equal functionality in software. It is still too cool to connect to a regular home network using a laptop, several smartphones, and (even) a smart TV. For a system administrator or other IT professional who has a static IP and a small home server, which is not so uncommon these days, it seems like this is a great choice of a home router. Or for a small workplace, up to 100 square metres, where the majority of computers are laptops and you require broad access to a printer and additional file storage in addition to being able to access the Internet.
