The ZEN4 version of the Ryzen processor has arrived in the year 2022. In this study, we evaluate and benchmark the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. With a processor that easily exceeds 5 GHz, 16 (Big) CPU cores on that updated processing architecture, and an entirely new platform that supports PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5. AMD has debuted its first Ryzen 7000 processors based on ZEN4. This year has seen the arrival of several improved graphics cards, but not much more in the way of new component gear. also, you can check our article on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review: Design
Based on AMD’s newest architecture, Zen 4, is the Ryzen 9 7950X. This new architecture, like the Zen 3 before it, continues AMD’s chiplet-based design strategy, giving it a high-level appearance resembling all of the preceding Zen CPU designs. AMD has nevertheless been able to significantly increase performance thanks to modifications in the core architecture and a switch to a new 5nm manufacturing process. In general, the Zen 4 is expected to be larger and more durable than the Zen 3. Compared to the previous Zen 3 design, Zen 4 has a more robust front end with hardware that is capable of making two branch-per-cycle predictions. This enhancement increases the total throughput on the CPU cores and decreases pipeline stalls. Compared to Zen 3, AMD also doubled the amount of its L1 B2B cache. In addition, the Op cache was expanded by 68% in comparison to Zen 3 as was the size of the L2 B2B cache by an unspecified amount. Three more macro-ops can now be processed through the Op cache each cycle thanks to an increase in its throughput. The load queue is 22% bigger and the L2 DTLB cache is 50% bigger on the load/store end of the chip, which also features larger caches. The execution engines in the core also include larger register files for integer and floating-point computations, as well as instruction retire queues that are 25% bigger. To help keep the cores fed with data, the chip’s overall buffer size was increased, and the total capacity of the L2 cache was increased from 512K to 1,024K per core.
Configurations
DDR5 memory is being added to AMD’s processors in this generation, which is fascinating. Since AMD has made the switch, DDR4 is all but dead, even though Intel has supported DDR5 for almost a year. However, we maintained the closest feasible proximity across our test benches by only replacing 32GB of DDR4-3200 with 32GB of DDR5-6000 (the sweet spot for Ryzen 7000, according to AMD). Along with the aforementioned chips, we also put AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X3D to the test in gaming. Although that processor doesn’t truly compete with the Ryzen 9 7950X, it’s still crucial to include in gaming benchmarks. We recently replaced the CPU on our Zen 3 test bench with that one. you can read our article on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review. The Ryzen 7000 CPUs use the new AM5 socket, which is different from all previous Ryzen processors, therefore you’ll need to change your motherboard. Only X670 and X670E motherboards are available right now, but AMD will provide B650 choices in October. If you’re trying to figure out which chipset is best for you, be sure to read our articles on AM5 and X670.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review: Features
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a 16-core, 32-thread monster of a CPU that was built using TSMC’s 5nm FinFET process after years of development. It appears to have been well worth the wait. AMD 7000-series processors can now utilize PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 RAM (the latter is not optional), which is something Intel has been able to do for almost a year already since the release of Intel Alder Lake in November 2021, most notably for the Ryzen 9 7950X. The extended support of DDR4 means that many customers probably didn’t even take use of one of Intel’s most exclusive features during the last year. Unfortunately for Intel, just providing a platform for these two technologies doesn’t mean that consumers will be able to use them. With the introduction of this processor, Intel’s one-year exclusivity with respect to next-generation memory, storage, and add-in cards has come to an end, and the company was hardly able to capitalise on its first-mover advantage. The Ryzen 9 7950X still requires an AM5 motherboard, however you may use the same cpu cooler you used with an AM4 board with the new AM5 processors. Although it may not be the largest savings, every little bit helps when building. With regard to the chip itself, its 16 full-performance cores have a base speed of 4.5 GHz and a boost rate of 5.7 GHz, which is roughly a full 40% faster than the base clock and 12% faster than the boost clock of the Core i9-12900performance K’s cores, respectively. The core speeds have increased similarly to those of the Ryzen 9 5950X, with the 7950X’s base clock running roughly 32% faster than the 5950X’s and its boost clock running about 16% faster.
Integrated graphics
Since the introduction of the Ryzen chips, AMD has been adding integrated graphics processors (IGPs) to a small subset of its desktop processors. Those versions were typically denoted by a “G” at the end, such as the Ryzen 7 5700G. But this will be a standard feature starting with the Ryzen 7000 series. The Ryzen 7000-series processors’ graphics core is based on AMD’s RDNA 2 graphics technology. These chips are integrated into the chiplet processor with the CPU cores using TSMC’s 6nm manufacturing process. The graphics processor built inside the majority of Ryzen 7000-series processors will have merely two compute units with 64 shaders each, adding up to a total of 128 stream processors. It was clocked at 2,200MHz on both our Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 9 7950X samples, indicating that it may also be clocked at this speed on the other Ryzen 7000-series processors so far. The IGP also features eight TMUs and four ROPs. Asrock’s X670E Taichi, the motherboard we used for testing, only allowed us to set 512MB of RAM for the IGP.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review: Gaming
It is not realistic to buy a Ryzen 9 7950X solely for gaming unless you have money to spend. But since owners of flagship chips occasionally play after work, gaming is still a common way to assess chips. With the aggregate average of our nine 1080p benchmarks showing AMD underperforming Intel by around 1.5 percent, the 12900K defeated the 7950X in the race for the top spot. This result is expected because many games still priorities single-core speed; the 7950X’s performance here is comparable to that of its performance in other single-core benchmarks. However, this loss is quite minor in the real world. At already high frame rates, you’re typically looking at a difference of 3 to 12 frames per second. But you ask, what about 720p benchmarks? For practical reasons—a PC with a 7950X often runs games at 1080p or higher we decided to concentrate on 1080p benchmarks. But if you have to know what happens when you further isolate CPU performance, you can see how Ryzen 7000 performs at 720p by reading the test results from our sister site PC Welt, which looks at how the less expensive Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 5 7600X fare against a range of rival processors. Due to significant component variations amongst PC Welt’s test machines, this data cannot be directly compared to the gaming benchmarks mentioned above. Testing involved comparing various CPU, GPU, memory speed, and operating systems [7950X vs. 7900X & 7600X; RTX 3090 vs. RX 6900 XT; DDR5-6000 vs. DDR5-5200; Windows 11 vs. 10].
Performance
You can put whatever concerns you had to rest regarding the Ryzen 9 7950X’s strength. It consistently produced the best results of any CPU I’ve tested, and occasionally by a large margin. The finest examples of this are Geekbench 5 and Cinebench R23, where the Ryzen 9 7950X outperformed the Core i9-12900multi-core K’s performance by 30% and 36%, respectively. The single-core increases aren’t as noticeable, with Cinebench seeing a 1% increase and Geekbench seeing a 6% increase. However, there have been significant generational advancements. In Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5, AMD outperformed the Ryzen 9 5950X by 31% and 25%, respectively. The claim made by AMD that its single-core performance will outperform Ryzen 5000 by 29% was accurate. However, some real-world programmes even go above and beyond what Cinebench and Geekbench predict. With 16 full, fat cores, AMD flexes its muscle with performance gains of approximately 60% over the Ryzen 9 5950X and a staggering 76% over the Core i9-12900K in 7-zip. also, you can learn our article on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review. The Ryzen 9 7950X improved the performance of creative apps as well, cutting the encoding time in Handbrake by 19% and 34%, respectively, over the Core i9-12900K and prior generation. Even the overclocked Core i9-12900KS falls short of the Ryzen 9 7950X, a $800 CPU released by Intel in April. Although AMD and Intel always outperform one another in the CPU industry, AMD is demonstrating with the Ryzen 9 7950X that it is in the lead when it comes to performance. However, it is not without opposition. The 13th-generation Raptor Lake CPUs from Intel will be available soon, which should tip the performance balances in favour of balance.
Price
Retail prices for the Ryzen 9 7950X will be $699, £740 in the UK, and about 850 euros. It maintains the same 16-core, 32-thread design as its forerunners, but in addition to a new 5nm architecture, additional L2 cache, and a substantially higher TDP of 170W as opposed to 105W for the older 16-core CPUs. It should be able to reach considerably higher frequencies and perform better as a result of this.
Conclusion
The company’s top-tier SKU CPU for the 5nm Zen 4 architecture is the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. It boasts the greatest number of cores, threads, clock speeds, and pricing. The Ryzen 9 7950X’s stated MSRP is $699. It has a total of 16 cores and 32 threads, and it has a 170W TDP and 5.7GHz maximum speed. On the brand-new AMD AM5 platform, this is the best that can be done at the moment. Both DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 are supported by the new AM5 platform. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X has 16/32 Cores/Threads with a Base Clock of 4.5GHz. Its Max Boost Speed is 5.7GHz. For a total of 80MB of cache, it contains an L2 cache arrangement of 16x1MB and 64MB of L3 cache. The Max Socket Power (PPT), which is 230W but is closer to the real package power usage you will see at maximum load, is more than the TDP of 170W.
